Kakuro strategy: sum of far away cells
Posted on 2010-05-10 • (0)
After a series of kakuro strategies about difference of cells, here comes a variation of theme: sum of seemingly unrelated cells. Here is the starting[......]
Kakuro strategy: difference of multiple cells
Posted on 2009-01-29 • (2)
In previous post on Kakuro series, I showed how a simple difference of 2 cells can break through a seemingly difficult opening. Now I’m going to show a similar but more advanced version: difference of multiple cells.
[......]
Another Kakuro strategy: difference of 2 cells
Posted on 2008-08-09 • (5)
Last time I have had discussed about using arithmetics to solve kakuro (part 1, part 2); most of the methods are trivial for everybody except the last case which is not apparent. This one is also not apparent as well, and I have almost never encountered it except once. It is about:
Calculating the difference between 2 cells!
How can the difference of 2 cells be helpful? See below for initial configuration:
[......]
Solving Kakuro with arithmetics (cont’d)
Posted on 2008-02-29 • (1)
As discussed in previous post, kakuro can be tackled using simple addition and subtraction during initial stage, particularly if the kakuro puzzle contains some certain arrangement pattern. As an example, see the figure below:
[......]
Solving Kakuro with arithmetics
Posted on 2008-02-19 • (2)
Sort of puzzled — I haven’t seen anywhere mentioning that some kakuro puzzles can be solved with the help of simple arithmetics (yet). Indeed I don’t mean the whole puzzle can be solved merely with addition and subtraction; nor do I mean every puzzle can be worked on this way. Arithmetics usually only works at the beginning, and only works with some kind of puzzles. Here is a simple example. Consider the following fragment:
[......]
0/0 也是一個數?
Posted on 2007-01-06 • (0)

昨天看 MathForge 看到的,似乎已經是一個月前的「新聞」了。基本上,就是有個電腦系教授 James Anderson 說 0 除以 0 不再是無定義,將它定義為一個稱為 nullity 的數,就可以解決許多一般數學解決不了的問題。
說清楚一點,除了賦予 nullity 定義外,還有:
Calculate square root with pen and paper only (2)
Posted on 2007-01-01 • (0)
This is a continuation of previous article; here I’ll explain the reasoning behind the method. It’s basically related to the expansion of [......]